By. Dr. Joseph Mercola (video and article). The COVID-19 pandemic is serving as a cover for the rollout of a global technocratic vision, a.k.a. the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution or “Build Back Better.” The common goal of all these movements is to capture all the world’s resources for a small global elite that have the know-how to program the computer systems that will come to dictate the lives of everyone. It’s the ultimate form of totalitarianism and the absolute destruction of personal freedom and privacy.

By Christine E. Black. An assault survivor may be told by their assailant, “If you speak up, or step out of line, I’ll kill you – or your family.” This statement is just a few characters away from, “If you speak up or step out of line, it’ll kill you” (the virus). Or alternatively that you (or it) will kill someone you love. 

The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”.

A group of 22 scientists lists ten serious methodological errors of the Corman-Drosten PCR protocol being used in an estimated 70% of all PCR test kits world wide: Vaguely flawed test design, inadequate primer design, excessive differences in annealing temperatures (gene sequences other than SARS-CoV-2 could also be detected), problematic inadequate RT-qPCR protocol, lack of standardisation, no definition of positive and negative test result, omission of a Ct threshold, failure to validate at the molecular level, lack of a positive control to assess sensitivity, and lack of a negative control to exclude detection of other (corona) viruses.

By J.B. Handley. Since 1900, there’s been a dramatic 74% decline in mortality rates in developed countries, largely due to a marked decrease in deaths from infectious diseases. How much of this decline was due to vaccines? The history and data provide clear answers that matter greatly in today’s debate about vaccines as the race to find a vaccine for COVID-19 pushes us towards a vaccine that might be mandated for everyone.

This article by Lisa Miller of The Cut asks the question, What does a year of isolation and anxiety do to a developing brain? Learn about some of the harrowing effects that our unprecedented social experiment is causing.

Most people aren’t aware that the CDC has lumped influenza together with Covid and pneumonia in death rates with a new name called “PIC.” In fact, due to Covid-19, the CDC decided to totally suspend data collection for the 2020-2021 influenza season for the geographic spread of influenza. We now know the numbers are being hidden and manipulated to keep the mass panic going.

If the science was as airtight as those around me claimed, surely masks would have been recommended by January or February, not to mention during prior infectious disease outbreaks such as the 2009 swine flu. It seemed unlikely that the scientific proof became incontrovertible sometime between late February and late March, particularly in the absence of any new evidence surfacing during that time period.

In the only COVID-era randomized controlled trial of masks with over 6000 participants, no statistical advantage was found for wearing masks versus not wearing masks in terms of contracting COVID-19.